I bought the Apple Watch for three reasons:
- I had a FitBit. I was motivated by step-tracking and other quantified self measurements. The FitBit I had (the Force) was subject to a recall. Then it disintegrated. So I returned it and got my money back. And wanted to replace it.
- My schedule is complex. I often have ten or more meetings in a working day, with different people, in different locations. Meanwhile, the emails keep arriving. I’m constantly pulling my phone out my pocket to check where I’m supposed to be now, or next, or to send a quick reply to an email. An extension of my phone’s UI to my wrist could help.
- I’m a technophile and neophile. As with Google Glass, I am curious about the changes that this new technology will bring to our lives. I want to see this from the inside, early and as it’s happening. I want to see what happens when software designers and developers unleash their creativity on a new platform.
So how’s it going?
Fitness and the Quantified Self
|Battery Life||One of the strongest aspects of the dedicated fitness trackers is their battery life. My previous FitBit would last, comfortably, for a week between charges.||Nowhere near as bad as been made out. I haven't finished the day on less than 25% charge. But it needs to be charged every night without fail.|
|Sleep Tracking||Yes.||No, because it needs to charge overnight. And this is a shame, because I liked this aspect of the FitBit.|
|Step, Altitude Tracking||Counts steps. Counts floors climbed.||Counts steps. Counts floors climbed.|
|Heart Rate Monitoring||My old one didn't. The Charge HR and the Surge both do this.||Yes.|
|iPhone app||Good (although not as good as the Jawbone app).||Poor - doesn't really add any insight.|
That’s the feature list. But is going to make me fitter than a FitBit – quicker?
I’m hopeful. Because of notifications.
The FitBit tracked useful metrics and it provided nice mobile and web apps to track your progress. But the notifications were lame. As calls to action, they’d occur at the wrong time and in the wrong way.
The Apple Watch uses haptic alerts. They’re described as a tap on the wrist – but really they feel like an old-fashioned reception desk bell gets together with a jackboot wearing butterfly, in order to tango your freckles. In a good way.
Your wrist pings. Your watch says “Stand up and walk around for a minute”. You do it.
Your wrist pings and tells you you only have 3 more active minutes to bag to reach today’s target. You walk downstairs for a coffee and then back up.
Your wrist pings and tells you that you still have 100 calories to burn to reach today’s target. You go for a ten-minute walk. It’ll capture your movement and your increased heart rate anyway but just in case you want to record it:
It’s much, much easier to initiate these things than getting your phone out of your pocket, firing up Runkeeper and recording some activity. I think this makes it more likely that you’ll do it. The Fitness app pushes you to achieve three targets every day – 30 minutes of activity, 12 discrete hours in which you’ve stood for one minute, and an overall calorie burn target. It pushes you to complete this set of concentric rings:
The proof of the pudding will be, er, the elimination of the effects of the pudding. Apple needs to produce a much better iPhone/iPad app, and they also need a desktop or web app. They need to introduce the competitive, social, gamification elements. And the other fitness tracker business need to find a way for their apps to integrate properly on to the platform (MyFitnessPal food entry via the watch?). But I’m heartened by this start: